Objectives
To compare safety and efficacy of bipolar plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate (BPEP) vs holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) for management of large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (>80 g).
Patients and Methods
Patients with failed medical treatment, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >13, peak urinary flow rate (Qmax)<15 mL/s and prostate size ≥80 g were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial from November 2016 to February 2018 and managed by HoLEP (Group A; 33 patients) or BPEP (Group B; 31 patients). Patients on anticoagulants (AC) were not excluded. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Perioperative data were compared between both groups using Student's-t, Mann–Whitney, Paired-t, Wilcoxon signed rank, chi-square, or Fisher-exact tests as appropriate.
Results
There was no significant difference between both groups in age, rate of presentation with urinary retention, recurrent hematuria, frequency of patients on ACs/antiplatelets, prostate size, prostate specific antigen (PSA), Qmax, IPSS, quality of life (QoL), and post-void residual urine (PVRU). Operative time was significantly longer in BPEP (p = 0.003) and catheterization duration (p = 0.019). Other perioperative parameters including level of Na+ and hemoglobin, resected tissue weight, hospital stay, and complications were not significantly different between both groups. There was no need for blood transfusion in all patients. There was significant postoperative improvement in IPSS, PVRU, QoL, PSA, and Qmax in each group. However, there was no significant difference between both groups in these parameters.
Conclusion
HoLEP and BPEP are comparable regarding safety and efficacy for treatment of BPH (>80 g) including patients on ACs. However, BPEP required a longer catheterization duration and operative time. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03998150.
